Effects of social hierarchy-related stress on hormonal reactivity and milk production in dairy cows at a commercial dairy complex

Received 21.03.2026
Revised 04.08.2026
Published 04.09.2026

Abstract

Regrouping disrupts established social relationships among dairy cows. Temporary overstocking additionally increases competition for feed, water, and lying space. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hormonal and production responses of cows with different stress-resistance types to social hierarchy-related stress at a commercial dairy complex. Cortisol and adrenaline concentrations were measured in 86 lactating cows before and 12 hours after 36 additional cows were introduced into a 540 m² pen; the cows were classified by stress-resistance type from basal cortisol, and daily milk yield, milk fat, and milk protein were assessed. Low, unstable, and high stress resistance was identified in 13 cows (15.12%), 55 cows (63.95%), and 18 cows (20.93%), respectively. Cortisol increased from 129.86 to 138.23 nmol/L in low-resistance cows, decreased from 72.33 to 68.89 nmol/L in unstable cows, and remained almost unchanged in high-resistance cows, at 47.21 and 48.03 nmol/L. At 12 hours, adrenaline was lower than baseline by 35.13%, 41.00%, and 14.12%, respectively. Daily milk yield decreased by 4.18 kg, or 14.88%, in low-resistance cows and by 1.28 kg, or 4.62%, in unstable cows, whereas it increased by 0.39 kg, or 1.30%, in high-resistance cows. Milk fat decreased by 2.96%, 6.63%, and 0.46%, respectively, whereas milk protein changed by -0.46%, -2.26%, and +3.13%. Correlations between post-challenge cortisol and milk yield were 0.33, 0.18, and 0.45, respectively; all 95% confidence intervals included zero and all p values exceeded 0.05. Low-resistance cows had the greatest risk of production loss and should be managed using low-disruption regrouping procedures and reduced competition for essential resources

Keywords

herd regrouping; social competition; basal cortisol; adrenaline; daily milk yield; stocking density; individual reactivity
Suggested citation
Kaynidenov, N., Tileubek, U., Bexeitov, T., Chortonbaev, T., & Jaxybayeva, G. (2026). Effects of social hierarchy-related stress on hormonal reactivity and milk production in dairy cows at a commercial dairy complex. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, 24(3), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.63621/bknau./3.2026.81

References

  1. Bouissou, M.F., Boissy, A., Le Neindre, P., & Veissier, I. (2001). The social behaviour of cattle. In L.J. Keeling & H.W. Gonyou (Eds.), Social behaviour in farm animals (pp. 113-145). Wallingford: CABI Publishing. doi: 10.1079/9780851993973.0113.
  2. Brouček, J., Mihina, S., Uhrinčat, M., Lendelová, J., & Hanus, A. (2015). Impact of gestation and lactation stage on the dairy cow response following removal to unfamiliar housing and milking system. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 14(2), article number 3410. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2015.3410.
  3. Cook, N.J. (2012). Review: Minimally invasive sampling media and measurement of corticosteroids as biomarkers of stress in animals. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 92(3), 227-259. doi: 10.4141/cjas2012-045.
  4. Denham, J., & Adams Progar, A. (2023). Changes in Holstein heifer salivary cortisol concentrations and behavior after regrouping. Ruminants, 3(3), 255-265. doi: 10.3390/ruminants3030024.
  5. DeVries, T.J. (2019). Feeding behavior, feed space, and bunk design and management for adult dairy cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 35(1), 61-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.10.003.
  6. European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. (1976, March). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/087.
  7. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. (1986, March). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/123.
  8. Hernández, C.E., Thierfelder, T., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Berg, C., Orihuela, A., & Lidfors, L. (2014). Time lag between peak concentrations of plasma and salivary cortisol following a stressful procedure in dairy cattle. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 56, article number 61. doi: 10.1186/s13028-014-0061-3.
  9. Hopster, H., van der Werf, J.T.N., Erkens, J.H.F., & Blokhuis, H.J. (1999). Effects of repeated jugular puncture on plasma cortisol concentrations in loose-housed dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 77(3), 708-714. doi: 10.2527/1999.773708x.
  10. Hubbard, A.J., Foster, M.J., & Daigle, C.L. (2021). Impact of social mixing on beef and dairy cattle – a scoping review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 241, article number 105389. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105389.
  11. Jung, D.J.S., et al. (2024). Administration of chromium picolinate and meloxicam alleviates regrouping stress in dairy heifers. Animal Bioscience, 37(8), 1495-1502. doi: 10.5713/ab.24.0104.
  12. Krahn, J., Foris, B., Sheng, K., Weary, D.M., & von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2024). Effects of group size on agonistic interactions in dairy cows: A descriptive study. Animal, 18(3), article number 101083. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101083.
  13. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 97-VII LRK “On Responsible Treatment of Animals”. (2021, December). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z2100000097.
  14. Lyu, J., Wang, C., Zhao, X.W., Miao, E.Y., Wang, Z.P., Xu, Y., Bai, X.J., & Bao, J. (2023). Effect of group size and regrouping on physiological stress and behavior of dairy calves. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 22(3), 844-852. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.073.
  15. Marumo, J.L., Lusseau, D., Speakman, J.R., Mackie, M., Byar, A.Y., Cartwright, W., & Hambly, C. (2024). Behavioural variability, physical activity, rumination time, and milk characteristics of dairy cattle in response to regrouping. Animal, 18(3), article number 101094. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101094.
  16. Mormède, P., et al. (2007). Exploration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare. Physiology & Behavior, 92(3), 317-339. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.12.003.
  17. Möstl, E., & Palme, R. (2002). Hormones as indicators of stress. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 23(1-2), 67-74. doi: 10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00146-7.
  18. Nogues, E., Lecorps, B., Weary, D.M., & von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2020). Individual variability in response to social stress in dairy heifers. Animals, 10(8), article number 1440. doi: 10.3390/ani10081440.
  19. Patent for Utility Model No. 9336 “Method for Determining the Boundaries of Stress-Resistance Types in Dairy Cows”, Application No. 2024/0634.2. (2024). Retrieved from https://gosreestr.kazpatent.kz/.
  20. Phillips, C.J.C., & Rind, M.I. (2001). The effects on production and behavior of mixing uniparous and multiparous cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 84(11), 2424-2429. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74692-9.
  21. Proudfoot, K., & Habing, G. (2015). Social stress as a cause of diseases in farm animals: Current knowledge and future directions. The Veterinary Journal, 206(1), 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.05.024.
  22. Rault, J.L. (2012). Friends with benefits: Social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 136(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.002.
  23. Soonberg, M., Kass, M., Kaart, T., Barraclough, R., Haskell, M.J., & Arney, D.R. (2021). Effect of grouping on behaviour of dairy heifers and cows in the transition period. Journal of Dairy Research, 88(1), 45-51. doi: 10.1017/S0022029921000066.
  24. Tallo-Parra, O., Carbajal, A., Monclús, L., Manteca, X., & López-Béjar, M. (2018). Hair cortisol and progesterone detection in dairy cattle: Interrelation with physiological status and milk production. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 64, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2018.02.001.