Abstract
Brucellosis poses a serious threat to livestock production, hindering herd expansion and reducing product quality. Effective control of the epizootic process requires timely diagnostics and early identification of brucella carriers. The aim of this work was epizootiological monitoring and analysis of the epizootiological situation of brucellosis in cattle and small ruminants in the Almaty region. Biological material samples (blood serum, whole blood, parenchymal organs, lymph nodes, aborted foetuses) were examined, and official veterinary reporting data from the Veterinary Control and Surveillance Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republican Anti-Epizootic Unit, and the regional branch of the Republican Veterinary Laboratory for 2021-2023 were analysed. A total of 1,989 samples were collected and examined in the Almaty region: 867 cattle serum samples, 1,022 small ruminant serum samples, 30 cattle whole blood samples, 50 small ruminant whole blood samples, and 20 pathological material samples. Serological diagnostics revealed positive results in 16 cattle and 6 small ruminants. Bacterial culture growth from pathological material was not established by bacteriological methods. Based on statistical data, the epizootiological situation of brucellosis for 2021-2023 was studied, districts with varying degrees of infection were identified, and an epizootiological map of infection distribution was compiled. A decrease in cattle morbidity was established during 2021-2023, despite an increase in livestock numbers from 238,751 to 780,417 animals, indicating the effectiveness of anti-epizootic measures. In small ruminants, morbidity increased from 0.03 to 0.08% during 2021-2022 with a more than 15-fold increase in livestock numbers; however, in 2022-2023, morbidity decreased, demonstrating positive results of the implemented measures
Keywords
References
- Abutalip, A., Bizhanov, A., Matikhan, N., Karabassova, A., & Orynbayeva, B. (2024). Regional epidemiology of brucellosis infection in modern conditions of animal husbandry technology in Kazakhstan (by the degree of spread and incidence). Scientific Horizons, 27(5), 20-31. doi: 10.48077/scihor5.2024.20.
- Aliyev, J., Alakbarova, M., Garayusifova, A., Omarov, A., Aliyeva, S., Freti, D., & Godfroid, J. (2022). Identification and molecular characterization of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis isolated from milk in cattle in Azerbaijan. BMC Veterinary Research, 18, article number 71. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03155-1.
- Askarov, A.M., Bekshin, Zh.M., Kundashev, K.U., Bissenova, G.N., Temirkhanov, A.Zh., & Serikovna, S.Z. (2024). Brucellosis – an analysis of the epidemiological and epizootological situation in the world and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Micribiology and Virology, 3(46), 9-31. doi: 10.53729/MV-AS.2024.03.01.
- Brangsch, H., et al. (2023). Genotype diversity of brucellosis agents isolated from humans and animals in Greece based on whole-genome sequencing. BMC Infectious Diseases, 23(1), article number 529. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08518-z.
- Dadar, M., Shahali, Y., & Fakhri, Y. (2020). A primary investigation of the relation between the incidence of brucellosis and climatic factors in Iran. Microbial Pathogenesis, 139, article number 103858. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103858.
- Dahmani, A., Khelifi-Touhami, N.A., Khelifi-Touhami, M.K.-T., & Ouchene, N. (2022). Brucellosis: A retrospective sero-epidemiological study. Journal of Veterinary Physiology and Pathology, 1(2), 43-48. doi: 10.58803/jvpp.v1i2.1.
- Daugalieva, A., & Daugalieva, S. (2025). Molecular and genetic characteristics and epidemiological significance of brucella isolates circulating in Kazakhstan. Science and Education, 1(3(80)), 283-307. doi: 10.52578/2305-9397-2025-3-1-283-307.
- Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. (2010, September). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.
- Franc, K.A., Krecek, R.C., Häsler, B.N., & Arenas-Gamboa, A.M. (2018). Brucellosis remains a neglected disease in the developing world: A call for interdisciplinary action. BMC Public Health, 18(1), article number 125. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-5016-y.
- GOST 33675-2015. (2016). Interstate standard. Animals. Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis. Bacteriological methods. Retrieved from https://meganorm.ru/Data2/1/4293758/4293758087.pdf.
- GOST 34105-2017. (2017). Interstate standard. Animals. Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis. Serological methods. Retrieved from https://meganorm.ru/Data/646/64665.pdf.
- Haif, A., Khelifi-Ouchene, N.A., Khelifi, M., Ouchetati, I., Zeroual, F., & Ouchene, N. (2021). Abortive diseases and their various associated risk factors in small ruminants in Algeria: A systematic review. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(6), article number 520. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02926-6.
- Hegazy Y., et al. (2022). Trans-species transmission of Brucellae among ruminants hampering brucellosis control efforts in Egypt. Applied Microbiology, 132(1), 90-100. doi: 10.22541/au.164865111.12602771/v1.
- Liu, W., Dong, Y., Zhou, W., & Sun, A. (2025). Global research hotspots and trends in brucellosis: A bibliometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, article number 1617217. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1617217.
- Ntirandekura, B.J., Matemba, E.L., Kimera, S.S., Muma, B.J., & Karimuribo, E.D. (2021). Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania. African Health Sciences, 21(2), 523-530. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6.
- Oyetola, W.D., Diallo, K., Kreppel, K., Kone, P.S., Schelling, E., Bonfoh, B., & Alambedji, R.B. (2021). Factors influencing the transborder transmission of brucellosis in cattle between Côte d’Ivoire and Mali: Evidence from literature and current key stakeholders. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, article number 630580. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.630580.
- Papaparaskevas, J., Procopiou, A., Routsias, J., Vrioni, G., & Tsakris, A. (2023). Detection of virulence-associated genes among Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus clinical isolates in Greece, 2001-2022. Pathogens, 12(11), article number 1274. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12111274.
- Robaj, A., et al. (2021). Infectious abortions in small ruminants: Challenges for diagnosis and public health. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 21(6), 475-477. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2731.
- Taipova, A.A., Beishova, I.S., Alikhanov, K.D., Otarbayev, В.K., Ulyanov, V.A., Ginayatov, N.S., & Dushaeva, L.Zh. (2023). Monitoring of the epizootic situation on animal brucellosis in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Science and Education, 2(2(71), 161-169. doi: 10.52578/2305-9397-2023-2-2-161-169.
- Tito, M.H., Arifuzzaman, M., Jannat, M.H.E., Rahman, M.S., Sharmy, S.T., Nasrin, A., Asaduzzaman, M., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Prince, D.B., & Asif, A.H. (2023). A comparative study of ensemble machine learning algorithms for brucellosis disease prediction. Letters in Animal Biology, 3(2), 23-27. doi: 10.62310/liab.v3i2.119.
- Tursunov, K.T., Bulashev, A.K., & Zhumalin, A.Kh. (2017). Using recombinant brucella proteins to determine antibiotics in serum-positive animals. Science Bulletin of the Kazakh Agrotechnical University named after S. Seifullin (Interdisciplinary), 1(92), 65-74.
- Wakjira, B.S., Jorga, E., Lakew, M., Olani, A., Tadesse, B., Tuli, G., Belaineh, R., Abera, S., Kinfe, G., & Gebre, S. (2022). Animal brucellosis: Seropositivity rates, isolation and molecular detection in Southern and Central Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports, 13, 201-211. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S372455.
- World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). (2023). Brucellosis (Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis). В: Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Retrieved from https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-manual-online-access/.