Biological and productive features of fine-fleeced sheep in purebred breeding and crossbreeding in south-eastern Kazakhstan

Received 06.10.2025
Revised 11.02.2026
Published 10.03.2026

Abstract

In Kazakhstan, sheep farming remains an important sector, providing both food and raw materials for industry. In the context of declining wool value, the development of meat production has become particularly relevant, making the selection of suitable breeds essential for improving productivity. The aim of the study was to assess imported fine-wool rams from Australia and the Kyrgyz Republic when used for crossbreeding with Kazakh Fine-Wool ewes under the foothill conditions of the Akbulak farm in Almaty region. Three groups of ewes, each consisting of 150 head, were formed, using 3 Australian Meat Merino (AMM) rams, 3 Kyrgyz Mountain Merino (KMM) rams and 3 Kazakh Fine-Wool (KF) rams. Both purebreeding and industrial crossbreeding methods were applied, enabling accelerated modification of hereditary and physiological characteristics. The results showed that the experimental rams exhibited a strong constitution, high live weight and excellent wool yield. Clinical indicators in all groups remained within physiological norms, with no significant intergroup differences. Haematological parameters were maintained at an optimal level and varied seasonally, reflecting the intensity of oxidative-reduction processes. The highest fertility was recorded in Group I (KF × KF) at 121.0%, which exceeded Groups II (AMM × KF) and III (KMM × KF) by 1.65% and 3.30%, respectively. Lamb survival to weaning in Group I reached 97.3%, surpassing that of contemporaries by 1.4% and 1.7%. The practical value of the research lies in demonstrating that the use of AMM and KMM rams in Kazakh Fine-Wool flocks can improve wool fineness, enhance the histomorphological structure of the skin-fleece system, increase ewe fertility and lamb survival, and contribute to higher mutton production in the foothill regions of south-eastern Kazakhstan

Keywords

Kazakh Fine-Fleeced breed; Australian Meat Merino; Kyrgyz Mountain Merino; fertility; live weight; body measurements; physiological and haematological parameters
Suggested citation
Prmanshaev, M., Basitov, K., & Ataibekov, B. (2026). Biological and productive features of fine-fleeced sheep in purebred breeding and crossbreeding in south-eastern Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, 24(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.63621/bknau./1.2026.41

References

  1. Abdulmuslimov, A., Yuldashbaev, Y., Kubatbekov, T., Chylbak-ool, S., Savchuk, S., & Kulmakova, N. (2024). Sheep farming development: Utilizing the biological capabilities of Dagestan breed sheep and crossbreeds. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1405(1), article number 012033. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1405/1/012033.
  2. Azhibekov, A.S., Derkenbaev, S.M., Osmonaliev, S.K., Samykbaev, A.K., Shergaziev, U.A., & Bekturov, A.B. (2023). Questions of admixture crossing in semi-fine-wool sheep breeding in Kyrgyzstan. BIO Web of Conferences, 66, article number 10003. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20236610003.
  3. Ceccobelli, S., et al. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of the genetic diversity and environmental adaptability in worldwide Merino and Merino-derived sheep breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution, 55, article number 24. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00797-z.
  4. Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Bred, Supplied or Used for Scientific Purposes. (2014, December). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/388535/CoPanimalsWeb.pdf.
  5. Deniskova, T., et al. (2019). Population structure and genetic diversity of sheep breeds in Kyrgyzstan. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, article number 1311. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01311.
  6. Dossybayev, K., Orazymbetova, Z., Mussayeva, A., Saitou, N., Zhapbasov, R., Makhatov, B., & Bekmanov, B. (2019). Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep using microsatellite analysis. Archives Animal Breeding, 62, 305-312. doi: 10.5194/aab-62-305-2019.
  7. Dvalishvili, V.G., & Milchevsky, V.D. (2021). Selection of quantitative traits when crossing fine-coarse wool sheep with Tsigai rams. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 848(1), article number 012069. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/848/1/012069.
  8. Emsen, E., Kutluca Korkmaz, M., & Odevci, B.B. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted selection strategies in sheep: Linking reproductive traits with behavioral indicators. Animals, 15(14), article number 2110. doi: 10.3390/ani15142110.
  9. GOST 13496.4-2019. (2020). Feed, compound feed, compound feed raw materials. Methods for determining nitrogen and crude protein content. Retrieved from https://vsegost.com/Catalog/71/71526.shtml.
  10. GOST 31675-2012. (2013). Feed. Methods for determining crude fibre content using intermediate filtration. Retrieved from https://vsegost.com/Catalog/52/52702.shtml.
  11. GOST R 57784-2017. (2019). Breeding farm animals. Methods for determining productivity parameters of beef cattle. Retrieved from https://vsegost.com/Catalog/65/65600.shtml.
  12. Iskakov, K.A., Kulataev, B.T., Zhumagaliyeva, G.M., & Pares Casanova, P.M. (2017). Productive and biological features of Kazakh Fine-Wool sheep in the conditions of the Almaty region. Online Journal of Biological Science, 17(3), 219-255. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2017.219.225.
  13. Islamov, E.I., Kulmanova, G.A., Kulataev, B.T., Bekbaeva, D.N., & Zhumanova, A.S. (2021). Enhancement of the reliability of animal genotyping for improving wool productivity in South-Kazakh Merino sheep. Archives of Razi Institute, 76(6), 1703-1714. doi: 10.22092/ari.2021.356235.1809.
  14. Islamov, Y.I., Beishova, I.S., Kulmanova, G.A., Ibrayev, D.K., & Mukhametzharova, I.E. (2025). Zootechnical and genealogical characteristics of lines of Kazakh meat-wool semi-fine-wool sheep and South Kazakh Merino bred in the Moyynkum sands of the Zhambyl region. Science and Education, 6(3), 96-105. doi: 10.52578/2305-9397-2025-3-96-105.
  15. ISO/IEC 17025:2019. (2021). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Retrieved from https://meganorm.ru/Data/712/71232.pdf.
  16. Karatieieva, O., Polishchuk, T., & Posukhin, V. (2022). Evaluation of productive qualities of sheep of Askani fine-wool breed. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 26(2), 59-66.
  17. Khamzina, A., Smagulov, D., Dossybayev, K., Kantanen, J., & Khamzin, K. (2025). Assessing runs of homozygosity reveals production traits of Kazakh sheep breeds. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 85, article number e292980. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.292980.
  18. Lakota, E. (2025). Productivity of Kuibyshev sheep of different intra-breed types. Journal of Osh State University. Agriculture: Agronomy, Veterinary and Zootechnics, 4(2), 28-36. doi: 10.52754/16948645_2025_4(2)_28.
  19. Oberpenning, J., Brügemann, K., & Koenig, S.A. (2025). Characterization of German sheep production systems and derivation of respective economic values for breeding traits. Veterinary and Animal Science, 27, article number 100432. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2025.100432.
  20. Ombayev, A., Ukbaev, H., Shamekenova, R., & Abdurasulova, A. (2020). Astrakhan breeds sheep of Kazakhstan. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of Agricultural Sciences, 1(55), 17-23. doi: 10.32014/2020.2224-526X.3.
  21. Rahim, A., Rajaravindra, K.S., Chaudhary, R., Pourouchottamane, R., Chauhan, P., Gowane, G.R., & Kumar, A. (2025). Comparison of different models for the estimation of genetic parameters of wool traits in intercross sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 245, article number 107462. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2025.107462.
  22. Rasali, D.R., Shrestha, J.N.B., & Crow, G.H. (2006). Development of composite sheep breeds in the world: A review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 86(1), 1-24. doi: 10.4141/A05-073.
  23. Ruziboev, N., & Ashurov, B. (2025). The state, achievements, and prospects for the development of sheep breeding in Uzbekistan. Journal of Osh State University. Agriculture: Agronomy, Veterinary and Zootechnics, 4(2), 37-47. doi: 10.52754/16948645_2025_4(2)_37.
  24. Vijayakumar, C., Chitrambigai, K., & Enbavelan, P.A. (2025). Optimizing sheep reproductive performance through technological interventions. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, 10(4), 27-31. doi: 10.22271/veterinary.2025.v10.i4a.2175.
  25. Yessengaliev, K., & Kassimova, G.V. (2023). The use of sheep producers of the Akzhaik meat and wool breed to improve the meat productivity of fine-fleeced sheep. Science and Education, 4(73), 21-27. doi: 10.52578/2305-9397-2023-4-21-27.
  26. Young, J.M., Thompson, A.N., Curnow, M., & Oldham, C.M. (2011). Whole-farm profit and the optimum maternal liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks lambing in winter and spring are influenced by the effects of ewe nutrition on the progeny’s survival and lifetime wool production. Animal Production Science, 51, 821-833. doi: 10.1071/AN10078.
  27. Zhumadillayev, N., Dossybayev, K., Khamzina, A., Kapasuly, T., Khamzina, Z., & Tlevlesov, N. (2022). SNP genotyping characterizes the genome composition of the New Baisary fat-tailed sheep breed. Animals, 12(11), article number 1468. doi: 10.3390/ani12111468.
  28. Zhumadillayev, N., Yuldashbaev, Y., Karynbaev, A., Khudaiberdiev, A., & Efendiev, B. (2021). Exterior features and productivity of Kazakh Fine-Wool sheep and crossbreeds with meat breeds. E3S Web of Conferences, 262, article number 02019. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202126202019.