ISSN 1694-6286
e-ISSN 1694-9250
Submit Article
English
Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University

Search Article

Population structure of Kyrgyz Mountain Merino sheep: Analysis of nuclear locus variability

T Tyrgoot Chortonbaev Z Zhainagul Isakova E Esenbek Belek uulu
Received 30.06.2025
Revised 29.10.2025
Published 12.12.2025

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to preserve local, unique and highly adapted breeds of farm animals in the context of global climate change and a reduction in the number of breeding stock. The Kyrgyz Mountain Merino is a valuable genetic resource, highly adaptable to mountain conditions, with high-quality wool and efficient use of scarce feed. However, a limited gene pool and increasing inbreeding pose risks to the breed’s productivity and adaptability. The aim of the study was to analyse the population structure of the Kyrgyz Mountain Merino based on an assessment of nuclear locus variability. To achieve this goal, sheep were genotyped using a panel of highly polymorphic microsatellite markers (SSR) recommended by the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). Allele diversity indices, observed and expected heterozygosity, F_IS fixation coefficients, Nei genetic distances were calculated, and population structure analysis was performed using cluster analysis, PCA and STRUCTURE model methods. The results of the study showed a high level of allelic diversity at most loci (number of alleles per locus 6-14, effective number of alleles Ne 3.41-6.21, PIC > 0.69). The observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.68-0.73) practically corresponded to the expected (He = 0.70-0.74), and the F_IS coefficients remained low (0.012-0.028), indicating the absence of pronounced inbreeding. Genetic differentiation between groups was weak (F_ST = 0.018-0.032), Nei’s genetic distances were minimal (0.038-0.051), and STRUCTURE analysis revealed two conditional genetic clusters with uniform distribution across groups, confirming the integrity of the population. The practical value of the study lies in identifying the current state of the Kyrgyz Mountain Merino gene pool, which allows for the development of recommendations for controlled selection work, the preservation of unique alleles, and the maintenance of genetic diversity of the breed, ensuring its resistance to adverse environmental conditions

Keywords

genetic diversity; microsatellite markers; population structure; heterozygosity; fixation coefficient; allelic diversity; Kyrgyz sheep
Suggested citation
Chortonbaev, T., Isakova, Zh., & Belek uulu, E. (2025). Population structure of Kyrgyz Mountain Merino sheep: Analysis of nuclear locus variability. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, 23(4), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.63621/bknau./4.2025.63

References

  1. Abdelmanova, A.S., et al. (2021). Comparative study of the genetic diversity of local steppe cattle breeds from Russia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan by microsatellite analysis of museum and modern samples. Diversity, 13(8), article number 351. doi: 10.3390/d13080351.
  2. Bekturov, A.В., Isakova, Z., Kipen, V.N., Chortonbaev, T., Mukeeva, S.B., Osmonaliev, S.K., & Aitbaev, K.А. (2023). A genogeographic study of the Kyrgyz Mountain Merino via microsatellite markers. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 27(2), 162-168. doi: 10.18699/VJGB-23-22.
  3. Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, M., & Davis, R.W. (1980). Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 32(3), 314-331.
  4. Ceccobelli, S., et al. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of the genetic diversity and environmental adaptability in worldwide Merino and Merino-derived sheep breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution, 55(1), article number 24. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00797-z.
  5. Colli, L., et al. (2015). Whole mitochondrial genomes unveil the impact of domestication on goat matrilineal variability. BMC Genomics, 16, article number 1115. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2342-2.
  6. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 “On the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes”. (2010, September). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.
  7. Duncanson, G.R. (2025). Veterinary treatment of sheep and goats (2nd ed.). Oxfordshire: Cabi.
  8. FAO. (2011). Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO animal production and health guidelines. No. 9. Rome: FAO.
  9. Gáspárdy, A. (2021). Reality of mitogenome investigation in preservation of native domestic sheep breeds. In A. Elkelish (Ed.), Landraces-traditional variety and natural breed (Chapter 10). London: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.95768.
  10. Gootwine, E. (2020). Genetics and breeding of sheep and goats. In F.W. Bazer, G.C. Lamb & G. Wu (Eds.), Animal agriculture (pp. 183-198). Amsterdam: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00010-0.
  11. Granero, A., Anaya, G., Demyda-Peyrás, S., Alcalde, M.J., Arrebola, F., & Molina, A. (2022). Genomic population structure of the main historical genetic lines of Spanish Merino sheep. Animals, 12(10), article number 1327. doi: 10.3390/ani12101327.
  12. Grasso, A.N., Goldberg, V., Navajas, E.A., Iriarte, W., Gimeno, D., Aguilar, I., Medrano, J.F., Rincón, G., & Ciappesoni, G. (2014). Genomic variation and population structure detected by single nucleotide polymorphism arrays in Corriedale, Merino and Creole sheep. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 37(2), 389-395. doi: 10.1590/s1415-47572014000300011.
  13. Gurgul, A., Jasielczuk, I., Miksza-Cybulska, A., Kawęcka, A., Szmatoła, T., & Krupiński, J. (2021). Evaluation of genetic differentiation and genome-wide selection signatures in Polish local sheep breeds. Livestock Science, 251, article number 104635. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104635.
  14. Iskakov, K.A., Kulatayev, B.T., Zhumagaliyeva, G.M., & Casanova, P.M.P. (2017). Productive and biological features of Kazakh fine-wool sheep in the conditions of the Almaty region. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 17(3), 219-225. doi: 10.3844/ojbsci.2017.219.225.
  15. Kawęcka, A., Pasternak, M., Miksza-Cybulska, A., & Puchała, M. (2022). Native sheep breeds in Poland – importance and outcomes of genetic resources protection programmes. Animals, 12(12), article number 1510. doi: 10.3390/ani12121510.
  16. Kulibaba, R., Sakhatskyi, M., & Liashenko, Y. (2023). Analysis of genotyping features of bovine cattle individuals at the CSN2 locus using ACRS-PCR methods. Animal Science and Food Technology, 14(2), 44-56. doi: 10.31548/animal.2.2023.44.
  17. Li, X., et al. (2024). Whole-genome resequencing to investigate the genetic diversity and mechanisms of plateau adaptation in Tibetan sheep. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 15, article number 164. doi: 10.1186/s40104-024-01125-1.
  18. McKenzie, G.W., Abbott, J., Zhou, H., Fang, Q., Merrick, N., Forrest, R.H., Sedcole, J.R., & Hickford, J.G. (2010). Genetic diversity of selected genes that are potentially economically important in feral sheep of New Zealand. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, article number 43. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-43.
  19. Megdiche, S., Mastrangelo, S., Ben Hamouda, M., Lenstra, J.A., & Ciani, E. (2019). A combined multi-cohort approach reveals novel and known genome-wide selection signatures for wool traits in Merino and Merino-derived sheep breeds. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, article number 1025. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01025.
  20. Moioli, B., Pilla, F., & Tripaldi, C. (1998). Detection of milk protein genetic polymorphisms in order to improve dairy traits in sheep and goats: A review. Small Ruminant Research, 27(3), 185-195. doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(97)00053-9.
  21. Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283-292. doi: 10.1086/282771.
  22. Nei, M. (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89(3), 583-590. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583.
  23. Odjakova, T., Todorov, P., Kalaydzhiev, G., Salkova, D., Dundarova, H., Radoslavov, G., & Hristov, P. (2023). A study on the genetic diversity and subpopulation structure of three Bulgarian mountainous sheep breeds, based on genotyping of microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Research, 226, article number 107034. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107034.
  24. Peakall, R., & Smouse, P.E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics, 28(19), 2537-2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
  25. Punuru, P.R., Regula, V., Metta, M., Krovvidi, S., Bhumireddy, J.M., Baratam, P., Sunkara, V., & Poonooru, R.R. (2025). Genetic characterization of semi-arid sheep populations in India using microsatellite markers. Frontiers in Animal Science, 6, article number 1553610. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1553610.
  26. Romanov, M.N. (2021). British sheep breed diversity. Kent: Kent Academic Repository.
  27. Sambrook, J., & Russell, D.W. (2001). Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  28. Schillhorn van Veen, T.W. (1995). The Kyrgyz sheep herders at a crossroads. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  29. Weir, B.S., & Cockerham, C.C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38(6), 1358-1370. doi: 10.2307/2408641.
  30. Zholborsov, U., Chortonbaev, T., Azhibekov, A., & Bekturov, A. (2024). Biological and productive features of Kyrgyz Mountain Merino breed types in different climatic zones. BIO Web of Conferences, 83, article number 01005. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20248301005.