Economic significance of genetic diversity of Kyrgyz Mountain Merino sheep based on STR analysis of nuclear DNA

Received 14.04.2025
Revised 02.08.2025
Published 10.09.2025

Abstract

Preserving and assessing the genetic diversity of farm animals is one of the key tasks for sustainable development in the agricultural sector. This paper examined the economic significance of genetic diversity in Kyrgyz Mountain Merino (KMM) sheep based on an analysis of nuclear DNA variability using microsatellite markers (STR). The aim of the study was to determine the level of heterozygosity, inbreeding coefficients and allele richness in KMM compared to related fine-wool sheep breeds from Russia, Kazakhstan, Poland and Pakistan, as well as to determine their significance for breeding programmes and the economic sustainability of the industry. The methodological basis of the study included molecular genetic analysis of 12 STR markers, statistical evaluation of genetic parameters, and comparison of the results with international databases. It was found that the level of observed heterozygosity in KMM (Ho = 0.70) exceeds that of Russian (0.66), Polish (0.64) and Pakistani (0.65) fine-wool sheep. Kazakh breeds show similar values (0.68), but are characterised by a higher inbreeding coefficient (FIS = 0.06), which indicates a tendency towards a decrease in genetic diversity. In contrast, the inbreeding coefficient for KMM was only 0.03, indicating a balanced population structure. The results of the study confirmed that the preservation of the genetic diversity of the KMM breed is not only biologically but also economically important: higher genetic variability ensures adaptability to changing climatic conditions, increases productivity and reduces the costs of veterinary and breeding measures. Thus, the integration of genetic monitoring into the economic management of sheep breeding is a necessary condition for the sustainable development and competitiveness of KMM products in domestic and foreign markets

Keywords

sheep breeding in Kyrgyzstan; STR markers; molecular genetic analysis; population stability; genetic polymorphism; biotechnology in animal husbandry
Suggested citation
Chortonbaev, T., Isakova, Zh., Mambetova, E., Belek uulu, E., & Baytemir, M. (2025). Economic significance of genetic diversity of Kyrgyz Mountain Merino sheep based on STR analysis of nuclear DNA. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, 23(3), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.63621/bknau./3.2025.38

References

  1. Ceccobelli, S., et al. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of the genetic diversity and structure among Merino and Merino-derived sheep breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution, 55, article number 24. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00797-z.
  2. CIOMS. (1985). International guiding principles for biomedical research involving animals. Geneva: The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.
  3. Deniskova, T.E., Dotsev, A.V., Okhlopkov, I.M., Bagirov, V.A., Kramarenko, A.S., Brem, G., & Zinovieva, N.A. (2018). Characterization of the genetic structure of snow sheep (Ovis nivicola lydekkeri) of the Verkhoyansk Mountain chain. Russian Journal of Genetics, 54, 328-334. doi: 10.1134/S1022795418030031.
  4. Dimitriou, A.C., Maimaris, G., & Hadjipavlou, G. (2024). Assessment of breeding nuclei contributions to the genetic diversity and population structure of the Cyprus Chios sheep. Scientific Reports, 14, article number 29946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81678-3.
  5. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council “On the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes”. (2010, September). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.
  6. Dossybayev, K., Orazymbetova, Z., Mussayeva, A., Saitou, N., Zhapbasov, R., Makhatov, B., & Bekmanov, B. (2019). Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep using microsatellite analysis. Archives Animal Breeding, 62, 305-312. doi: 10.5194/aab-62-305-2019.
  7. FAO. (2015). The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.
  8. International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). (2019). Retrieved from https://www.isag.us/2019/.
  9. Iskakov, K.A., Kulatayev, B.T., Zhumagaliyeva, G.M., & Casanova, P.M.P. (2017). Productive and biological features of Kazakh fine-wool sheep in the conditions of the Almaty region. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 17(3), 219-225. doi: 10.3844/ojbsci.2017.219.225.
  10. Kappes, A., Tozooneyi, T., Shakil, G., Railey, A.F., McIntyre, K.M., Mayberry, D.E., Rushton, J., Pendell, D.L., & Marsh, T.L. (2023). Livestock health and disease economics: A scoping review of selected literature. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, article number 1168649. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1168649.
  11. Kawęcka, A., Pasternak, M., Miksza-Cybulska, A., & Puchała, M. (2022). Native sheep breeds in Poland – importance and outcomes of genetic resources protection programmes. Animals, 12(12), article number 1510. doi: 10.3390/ani12121510.
  12. Kerven, C., Russel, A.J.F., & Laker, J.P. (2002). Potential for increasing producers’ income from wool, fibre and pelts in Central Asia. Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute.
  13. Lavrentieva, A., Chernobay, E., Plakhtyukova, V., Shumaenko, S., & Dmitrik, I. (2021). Wool productivity and marketable properties of sheepskins of the new domestic dual-purpose sheep breed – Russian meat Merino. Head of Animal Breeding, 6. doi: 10.33920/sel-03-2106-02.
  14. Li, X., et al. (2024). Whole-genome resequencing to investigate the genetic diversity and mechanisms of plateau adaptation in Tibetan sheep. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 15, article number 164. doi: 10.1186/s40104-024-01125-1.
  15. McKenzie, G.W., Abbott, J., Zhou, H., Fang, Q., Merrick, N., Forrest, R.H., Sedcole, J.R., & Hickford, J.G. (2010). Genetic diversity of selected genes that are potentially economically important in feral sheep of New Zealand. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, article number 43. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-43.
  16. National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://stat.gov.kg/en/.
  17. Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist, 106(949), 283-292. doi: 10.1086/282771.
  18. Odjakova, T., Todorov, P., Kalaydzhiev, G., Salkova, D., Dundarova, H., Radoslavov, G., & Hristov, P. (2023). A study on the genetic diversity and subpopulation structure of three Bulgarian mountainous sheep breeds, based on genotyping of microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Research, 226, article number 107034. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107034.
  19. Pichler, R., et al. (2017). Short tandem repeat (STR) based genetic diversity and relationship of domestic sheep breeds with primitive wild Punjab Urial sheep (Ovis vignei punjabiensis). Small Ruminant Research, 148, 11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.12.024.
  20. Punuru, P.R., Regula, V., Metta, M., Krovvidi, S., Bhumireddy, J.M., Baratam, P., Sunkara, V., & Poonooru, R.R. (2025). Genetic characterization of semi-arid sheep populations in India using microsatellite markers. Frontiers in Animal Science, 6, article number 1553610. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1553610.
  21. Sharma, R., Ahlawat, S., Sharma, H., Sharma, P., Panchal, P., Arora, R., & Tantia, M.S. (2020). Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses unveil the genetic structure of native sheep breeds from three major agro-ecological regions of India. Scientific Reports, 10, article number 20422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77480-6.
  22. Teneva, A., Todorovska, E., Petrović, M.P., Kusza, S., Perriassamy, K., Caro-Petrović, V., Ostojić-Andrić, D., & Gadjev, D. (2018). Short tandem repeats (STR) in cattle genomics and breeding. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 34(2), 127-147. doi: 10.2298/BAH1802127T.
  23. Thompson, A.N., Ferguson, M.B., Gordon, D.J., Kearney, G.A., Oldham, C.M., & Paganoni, B.L. (2011). Improving the nutrition of Merino ewes during pregnancy increases the fleece weight and reduces the fibre diameter of their progeny’s wool during their lifetime. Animal Production Science, 51(9), 794-804. doi: 10.1071/AN10161.
  24. Tyrunskiy, V., Bogdanova, N., & Lyutskanov, P. (2023). Protective properties of the fleece of Taurian ewes of the Askanian fine fleece breed depending on the breeding differentiation rank. Animal Science and Food Technology, 14(2), 76-88. doi: 10.31548/animal.2.2023.76.
  25. Wanjala, G., Astuti, P.K., Bagi, Z., Kichamu, N., Strausz, P., & Kusza, S. (2023). A review on the potential effects of environmental and economic factors on sheep genetic diversity: Consequences of climate change. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 30(1), article number 103505. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103505.
  26. Wanjala, G., et al. (2025). Genetic diversity and adaptability of native sheep breeds from different climatic zones. Scientific Reports, 15, article number 14143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97931-2.
  27. Want, Q.H., Banday, M.T., Adil, S., Khan, H.M., & Khan, A.A. (2020). Evaluation of production performance of Kashmir Merino sheep under field conditionsJournal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(4), 1149-1152.
  28. Wright, S. (1978). Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  29. Zhu, L., Tang, L., Zhang, K., Nie, H., Gou, X., Kong, X., & Deng, W. (2025). Genetic and epigenetic adaptation mechanisms of sheep under multi-environmental stress environment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), article number 3261. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073261.