ANALYSIS OF THE EPIZOOTIC SITUATION IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ON BRUCELLOSIS OF CATTLE OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS

Salamat Chegirov; Jailobek Orozov; Mederbek Aidarov; Mambetaly Tursumbetov; Baiysh Dardanov; Klara Kursanbaeva

ANALYSIS OF THE EPIZOOTIC SITUATION IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ON BRUCELLOSIS OF CATTLE OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS

S Salamat Chegirov J Jailobek Orozov M Mederbek Aidarov M Mambetaly Tursumbetov B Baiysh Dardanov K Klara Kursanbaeva

Received 30.04.2022

Revised 19.07.2022

Published 24.08.2022

Abstract

The article presents the results of studies on the epizootic situation of brucellosis of cattle in the Kyrgyz Republic for 2019-2021. The dominant role of cattle in its infection with brucellosis has been revealed, and the widespread of this infection among farm animals has been noted. The most significant causes contributing to re-infection and maintenance of problems in animal husbandry for brucellosis have been identified. A zoning map of the territories and regions of the Kyrgyz Republic (KR) has been developed for the infection of animals with brucellosis (high, medium, low degree and safe zones), appropriate differentiated antiepizootic measures for the rehabilitation of farms from brucellosis have been recommended

Keywords

Brucellosis epizootological monitoring diagnostic studies epizootic map cattle

Suggested citation

Chegirov, S., Orozov, J., Aidarov, M., Tursumbetov, M., Dardanov, B., & Kursanbaeva, K. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE EPIZOOTIC SITUATION IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ON BRUCELLOSIS OF CATTLE OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, 20(3), 78-84.

References

[1] Foster, G., Osterman, B.S., Godfroy, J., Jacques, I., & Cloeckaert, A. (2007). Brucella ceti sp. nov. and Brucella pinnipedialis sp. nov. for Brucella strains with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 57(11), 2688-2693.

[2] Moreno, E. (2020). The hundred-year journey of the genus Brucella (Meyer and Shaw, 1920). FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 45, article number fuaa045.

[3] Kydyshov, K., Brangsh, H., Neubauer, G., Melzer, F., Matthias, W., Pletz, V., Usenbaev, N., Kazybaeva, D., Sharskenbekov, A., Aitkuluev, N., Chegirov, S., & Abdraev, M. (2022). Brucellosis in humans and animals in Kyrgyzstan. Microorganisms, 10(7), article number 1293.

[4] Sultanov, A.A., & Abutalip, A.A. (2013). Tasks of epizootological monitoring in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In Proceedings of the off-site meeting of the Committee on Agrarian Issues of the Majilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Problems and prospects of ensuring veterinary safety in livestock farming in Kazakhstan (pp. 123-127). Almaty.

[5] Iskandarov, M.I., Gulyukin, M.I., Gulyukin, A.M., Iskandarova, S.S., Albertyan, M.P., Fedorov, A.I., Sleptsov, E.S., Vinokurov, N.V., & Fedorov, V.I. (2017). Brucellosis in animals in Russia. Novosibirsk: ANS SibAK Publishing.

[6] Dudnikov, S.A. (2005). Quantitative epizootology: Fundamentals of applied epidemiology and biostatistics. Vladimir.

[7] Methodological guidelines for laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis: Standard operating procedures for diagnostics. (2019). Bishkek.

[8] Baramova, Sh.A., Abutalip, A., Kanatbaev, S.G., Aitkylova, A., Atovulozoda, R.A., Rasulov, S.A., & Radzhabov, Kh.I. (2020). Analysis of the epizootic situation of brucellosis in cattle in the Republic of Kazakhstan over the last three years. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan. Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, 2(209), 68-77.