KG0 – FAO AGRIS data provider 2026
ISSN 1694-6286
e-ISSN 1694-9250
Submit Article
English
Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University

Search Article

Characterisation of the papillary structure of the nasolabial mirror of cats

N Nazgul Tentieva K Kuban Arbaev
Received 27.01.2025
Revised 30.04.2025
Published 14.06.2025

Abstract

The relevance of this study is due to the need for scientifically sound, accurate and non-invasive methods of identification of domestic animals, in particular cats, in veterinary and forensic veterinary practice. Existing methods of identification (chipping, tagging, ournics) have a number of disadvantages – possibility of loss, painful procedure or allergic reactions. This increases the importance of finding alternative solutions. The aim of the work was to morphologically analyse the papillary structure of the nasolabial mirror of cats (Felis catus) and to scientifically substantiate its use as a unique identification trait of an animal. The following methods were applied during the study: taking prints using Trodat 9052 stamp pad and paper, scanning images of prints, digital processing using CorelDraw 2017 and Adobe Photoshop programs, as well as comparative morphological analysis of the obtained data. The nasolabial mirrors of 157 cats were examined, including repeated imprinting in 14 individuals after a certain time interval. It was found that papillary patterns of the nasolabial mirror have three stable morphological properties: individuality (uniqueness of the pattern in each individual), invariability (they are preserved during life) and ability to regenerate (restoration of the pattern in the absence of destruction of the microbial layer of the skin). Additionally, it was found that the obtained prints can serve as objective material for identification of the animal during veterinary examination, registration, forensic examination or in conditions of loss. The results have shown the possibility of developing a biometric system of accounting of pets based on the analysis of papillary structures of the nose. The practical significance of the study lies in the application of the results in veterinary clinics, forensic examination, customs authorities and in the creation of a unified database of domestic animals

Keywords

animal dermatoglyphics; papillary patterns of Felis catus; individual identification; morphological analysis; biometric veterinary medicine; forensic veterinary expertise
Suggested citation
Tentieva, N., & Arbaev, K. (2025). Characterisation of the papillary structure of the nasolabial mirror of cats. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, 23(2), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.63621/bknau./2.2025.10

References

  1. Andrew, W., Gao, J., Mullan, S., Campbell, N., Dowsey, A.W., & Burghardt, T. (2021). Visual identification of individual Holstein-Friesian cattle via deep metric learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 185, article number 106133. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106133.
  2. Cheema, G.S., & Anand, S. (2020). Automatic detection and recognition of individuals in patterned species. arXiv:2005.02905. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.02905.
  3. Cihan, P., Saygili, A., Özmen, N.E., & Akyuzlu, M. (2023). Identification and recognition of animals from biometric markers using computer vision approaches: A review. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 29(6), 581-593. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2023.30265.
  4. Directive 2010/63/EU on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. (2010, September). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.
  5. Frewein, J., & Vollmerhaus, B. (2003). Anatomy of dogs and cats. Stuttgart: Parey im MVS.
  6. Hitelman, A., Edan, Y., Godo, A., Berenstein, R., Lepar, J., & Halachmi, I. (2022). Short communication: The effect of age on young sheep biometric identification. Animal, 16(2), article number 100452. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100452.
  7. Immonen, V., Nepovinnykh, E., Eerola, T., Stewart, C.V., & Kälviäinen, H. (2023). Combining feature aggregation and geometric similarity for re-identification of patterned animals. arXiv:2308.06335. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.06335.
  8. Kaur, A., Kumar, M., & Jindal, M.K. (2022). Cattle identification with muzzle pattern using computer vision technology: A critical review and prospective. Soft Computing, 26, 4771-4795. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-06935-x.
  9. Kimani, G.N., Oluwadara, P., Fashingabo, P., Busogi, M., Luhanga, E., Sowon, K., & Chacha, L. (2023). Cattle identification using muzzle images and deep learning techniques. arXiv:2311.08148. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.08148.
  10. Lai, K., Tu, X., & Yanushkevich, S. (2020). Dog identification using soft biometrics and neural networks. arXiv:2007.11986. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2007.11986.
  11. Li, G., Erickson, G.E., & Xiong, Y. (2022). Individual beef cattle identification using muzzle images and deep learning techniques. Animals, 12(11), article number 1453. doi: 10.3390/ani12111453.
  12. Li, S., Kang, X., Feng, Y., & Liu, G. (2021). Detection method for individual pig based on improved YOLOv4 Convolutional Neural Network. In DSIT 2021: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on data science and information technology (pp. 231-235). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3478905.3478951.
  13. Malofeev, Yu.M., & Ermakova, S.P. (2006). Prospects for the study of dermatoglyphics in veterinary medicine. Bulletin of the Orenburg State Agrarian University, 4(12-1), 16-19.
  14. Meng, H., Zhang, L., Yang, F., Hai, L., Wei, Y., Zhu, L., & Zhang, J. (2025). Livestock biometrics identification using computer vision approaches: A review. Agriculture, 15(1), article number 102. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15010102.
  15. Ponomarev, V.V. (2016). Fragmentary traces of papillary pattern as a source of evidential information: Study guide. Moscow: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikot
  16. Samishchenko, S.S. (2003). Modern fingerprinting: Theory, practice and development trends. (Doctoral dissertation, Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow, Russia).
  17. Shafiev, A.P., Kudryashov, A.A., & Safronov, D.I. (2023). Morphometric studies of adult cow skin. Legal Regulation in Veterinary Medicine, 4, 210-213. doi: 10.52419/issn2782-6252.2023.4.210.
  18. Shojaeipour, A., Falzon, G., Kwan, P., Hadavi, N., Cowley, F.C., & Paul, D. (2021). Automated muzzle detection and biometric identification via few-shot deep transfer learning of mixed breed cattle. Agronomy, 11(11), article number 2365. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112365.
  19. Singh, R.R., Khalid, F., Ahlawat, T.R., Azman, A., Agrawal, A., Ghorpade, P., & Romle, A.A. (2024). Individual buffalo identification through muzzle dermatoglyphics images using deep learning approaches. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 59(1), 11-24. doi: 10.37934/araset.59.2.178191.
  20. Spotkay, S.E. (2019). Properties of papillary patterns of dog’s nasal plane. Veterinary Science of Kuban, 2, 24-26.
  21. Spotkay, S.E., & Lykhina, L.Yu. (2019). Analysis of skin patterns of the nose leaf of the German shepherd in a comparative aspect. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries, 14(1), 73-80. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X-2019-14-1-73-80.
  22. Stennett, M., Rubenstein, D.I., & Burghardt, T. (2022). Towards individual Grevy's zebra identification via deep 3D fitting and metric learning. arXiv:2206.02261. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.02261.
  23. Tuminaite, I., & Kröger, R.H.H. (2021). Rhinarium skin structure and epidermal innervation in selected mammals. Journal of Morphology, 282(3), 419-426. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21313.
  24. Yatsenko, I., Smirnov, O., & Kozachok, V. (2025). Forensic veterinary examination of animal bodies injured by glass fragments. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16(1), 40-58. doi: 10.31548/veterinary1.2025.40.